Tragedy: To sing or not to sing

I especially liked the desk in my office in Cherry Hill, N.J., where I was a rabbi from 2000-2010.  Made of solid honey maple, it had permanence. The desk, indeed, had been passed down through generations of assistant and associate rabbis at my congregation. But the desk also had a conflicted past – it had first been purchased for Rabbi Fred Neulander to welcome him to the congregation and Cherry Hill.  Rabbi Neulander was later convicted of hiring a hitman to kill his wife. Yes, I sat at a desk each day used previously by a convicted murderer.

And like the desk, I soon learned that the case of Fred Neulander had permanence in Cherry Hill.  It was a wound that resurfaced time and time again, making congregants question the legitimacy of their experiences and their trust in Jewish leaders.

  • Rabbi Neulander officiated at our wedding, is it still Jewishly valid?

  • He did the naming of our daughter. It’s his name on her naming certificate. Would you sign a new certificate?

  • I went to him for counseling and he really helped. But, now, can I trust his advice? Can I trust myself for believing in him?

  • I studied Torah with him. How do I relate to the morality that he taught?

Although I have never met him, Fred Neulander impacted my life in complicatedly profound ways – both professional and personal. My husband grew up in Cherry Hill, marginally involved in the organized Jewish community. Years before I met him, David had moved back to Cherry Hill after his father died.  A recent college graduate living in suburbia, David began learning with Rabbi Neulander, drawn in by his intellect and charisma. Rabbi Neulander sparked a lifelong commitment to Judaism in David – a commitment that is central to our marriage and life together. 

This past week, a friend shared the Playbill cover for A Wicked Soul in Cherry Hill – a new musical about the Neulander case written by Matt Schatz and being produced at the Geffen Playhouse in Los Angeles. I immediately got pulled into multiple online conversations about it from friends and former congregants in New Jersey.  A musical about Fred Neulander strikes me as insensitive at best. For theater goers in Los Angeles, it might be an entertaining and even enlightening evening out.  But, for a community that still hasn’t gotten over the trauma, it is still too early to sing about it – even nearly 30 years later. Most importantly, what about rachmones or empathy to Carol and Fred Neulander’s three children.  Have they not suffered enough without actors singing about their pain?

I would never suggest banning somebody else’s creative expression.  I do hope, though, that the playwright, Matt Schatz, and the Geffen Playhouse have sensitively considered the impact of their work. I am not sure if I am ready to see this musical, but I will be following its development and the audience's reaction to it.

Previous
Previous

Wordle Shalom

Next
Next

BOOK BANS, BURNINGS AND DISCUSSION